One of Earl Thomas’ foremost fears came to fruition.
The Seattle Seahawks safety had worried about playing this year without financial security beyond this season, at the end of which his contract was set to expire. A serious injury could be a significant blow to his earning potential.
And there he found himself on Sunday, riding on the back of the medical cart, his left leg fractured and in an air cast. As he exited, he raised a middle finger at the sideline of his own team, whose decision makers refused to give him an extension or trade as he requested.
His season is over. In all likelihood, so too is his time with the franchise for which he starred as a member of the "Legion of Boom," helping the organization reach back-to-back Super Bowls and a title in the 2013 season.
Thomas won't get an extension or trade. He’ll spend the remainder of the year recovering and then head to free agency with uncertainty. The Seahawks, however, will likely turn the page on the Thomas chapter – so long as they don't use the franchise tag – and continue their rebuild.
Football is a brutal game. But it’s even more brutal in its business.
Thomas’ situation will serve as a cautionary tale – another painful reminder for NFL players that they’re simply replaceable cogs in the wheel. For all of the sermons players receive from coaches about the need to sacrifice for the greater good of the team, the organization will always act according to its own best interest. And unlike their brethren in the NBA and NHL, who overwhelmingly operate on guaranteed contracts, the NFL's players have very little power in the grand scheme of things.
As Thomas rode off on the cart, it was perfectly clear why he held out until Week 1 of the regular season. It also adds further credence to running back Le’Veon Bell’s decision to not to sign his franchise tender with the Pittsburgh Steelers.
With teams holding virtually all of the power, players continue to find themselves at the center of both inner and outward conflict and scrutiny.
Seahawks linebacker Bobby Wagner described the dilemma that players like Thomas face while trying to take care of themselves as well as their team and teammates.
“If he doesn't come, then he's not a team player. If he does come and gets hurt, then it's 'He shouldn't have came.' … If I was him, I'd be pissed off," Wagner said on Sunday.
That analysis caught the eye of Bell. He commented on an Instagram post of the quote, “smh exactly…get right bro bro @earl ! I’ll continue to be the ‘bad guy’ for ALL of us.”
And this whole ordeal didn't have to happen. Not like this.
The Seahawks did put themselves into a restrictive financial situation. As they built what looked like a dynasty and stockpiled talent, success came quickly – and probably faster than even the organization expected. But when it came time to choose which stars to pay, tough decisions had to be made.
Over a few years, they shelled out deals to quarterback Russell Wilson, cornerback Richard Sherman, defensive end Michael Bennett and safety Kam Chancellor in addition to Wagner and Thomas. But those salaries all ate up resources. Meanwhile, things haven’t played out as hoped. A neck injury forced Chancellor out of football. The Seahawks this offseason traded Bennett to the Philadelphia Eagles in a cost-saving move and also cut Sherman, who signed with the San Francisco 49ers.
Meanwhile, the Seahawks refused to budge on Thomas. Yes, they’re strapped for cash and badly need to spend on their offensive line to protect their investment in Wilson. But no one would have blamed them for trading the safety as he asked.
Part of the reason why the Seahawks held onto Thomas stems from some division within the franchise. Coach Pete Carroll is described by those that know him as “a sentimental guy,” and he couldn’t bring himself to parting with Thomas despite the dispute, a person familiar with the organization’s inner workings told USA TODAY Sports. The person spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the subject.
But there’s a little more to it as well. NFL teams always want to maintain power. Even if they have no desire to keep or pay a player, they don’t like the idea of a player dictating terms.
Source: Read Full Article