Wuhan wet market was NOT the origin of the coronavirus pandemic, Chinese authorities claim – but it may have been the site of a ‘super-spreader’ event
- Evidence shows the virus originated in bats but not how it jumped to humans
- Researchers originally thought the virus started in the 116 acre wet food market
- This has been ruled out as testing of the animals at the market proved negative
- Authorities say the market may have been the site of a super-spreader event
- Here’s how to help people impacted by Covid-19
The Wuhan wet market was not the origin of the coronavirus pandemic as previously thought, studies show, but may have been the site of a super-spreader event.
Genetic evidence has confirmed that the virus originated in Chinese bats before it jumped to humans, but the exact location of the transition is unknown.
Originally Chinese authorities said the first cases of the virus emerged at the local seafood market, but a new investigation of the animals being sold ruled that out.
The Chinese Centres for Disease Control and Prevention took samples of the animals in the market and found none of them had coronavirus.
The Wuhan wet market was not the origin of the coronavirus pandemic as previously thought, studies show, but may have been the site of a super-spreader event.
As the animals in the market were negative for coronavirus it means they can’t have infected shoppers.
This led to the new theory that someone visiting the market had already contracted COVID-19 and became a super-spreader – giving it to many others.
The Chinese CDC said ‘it turns out the the wet market was a victim of the virus’.
A majority of the original 41 cases of COVID-19 reported to the World Health Organisation in December were linked to the 116 acres market.
This led to the wet market being shut down on January 1 – the majority of its 3,600 shops had reopened by April 14, according to reports.
The virus was likely circulating in Wuhan before those first 41 cases were reported.
In fact, 13 of the original cases showed no link to the wet market, according to the Chinese CDC study.
Research from January showed the first person confirmed to have coronavirus was likely exposed as early as December 1 – showing symptoms on December 8.
The ‘patient zero’ – the first person to actually contract COVID-19 in Wuhan – has not been confirmed but authorities believe it may have been a 55-year-old man from Hubei province infected on November 17.
This means the virus will likely have been spreading undetected in the human population around Wuhan for weeks before the ‘super spreader event’ at the market.
Colin Carlson, a zoologist at Georgetown University told Live Science that the wet market was likely the point where one sick person infected a large number of others.
He said to know for certain exactly how the virus jumped from animals to humans, where it spread and the exact origin could take years to find out.
‘This is an animal-origin virus that made the leap, maybe from bats to humans, maybe through… another animal, maybe through livestock. And we don’t have the data yet to know where or how,’ he said.
Originally Chinese authorities said the first cases of the virus emerged at the local seafood market, but a new investigation of the animals being sold ruled that out
Carlson said the idea of the wet market being the origin had become a useful narrative but the evidence hasn’t been particularly conclusive.
The narrative came from the fact wet markets sell exotic, endangered and trafficked animals that could be the link between bats and humans.
The fact none of the animals in the market that were sampled tested positive led to the super-spreader theory.
It wouldn’t be the only super-spreader event – as the virus progressed and spread around the world a number of infected individuals caused clusters of infections.
‘The novel coronavirus overturns much of what people have known and many of its patterns are beyond our cognition,’ said George Gao Fu of the Chinese CDC.
It could be some times before we know exactly what animal caused the virus to spread from bats to humans or even when – it’s taken months to rule out one site.
‘That takes time. The study that really definitively showed the bats that SARS came from was published in 2017,’ – 15 years after SARS first broke out.
‘It took that long to go through caves, to go through samples, and build an evidence base where we could confidently say: ‘This was the sort of bat, in this cave, at this time,’ Carlson said.
Source: Read Full Article